'I MEANT TO PAY FOR THAT' IS NOT A VALID DEFENSE IF YOU'VE BEEN CAUGHT WALKING OUT OF A TARGET WITH ALMOST $970 WORTH OF MERCHANDISE WITHOUT PAYING [DUMBASS]

A person was caught walking out of a Target store with nearly $970 worth of merchandise without paying, according to Fark.com RSS. The individual claimed 'I meant to pay for that' as a defense. The incident highlights a significant attempted theft, with the exact circumstances and outcome not fully detailed in the available information.

The total value of the merchandise in question is approximately $970, a substantial amount that suggests a serious offense. No further details are provided about the individual, their intentions, or the store's response beyond the initial claim of 'I meant to pay for that' being deemed invalid. The incident is categorized as 'funny' by the source, indicating it may be viewed as an egregious or foolish mistake.

The context of this incident is limited to the information provided by Fark.com RSS, which frames it as a humorous example of attempted shoplifting. There is no broader background or significance provided beyond the immediate details of the event.

• Approximately $970 worth of merchandise was involved
• The individual claimed they intended to pay
• The claim 'I meant to pay for that' was not accepted as a valid defense

Read the original source for full detail available at Fark.com RSS src